Guest Post by Illy Dinette, Graduate Student at Montana State University’s Counselor Education Program and Intern at Community Health Partners in Bozeman, Montana.
Emotion regulation is a critical aspect of mental health that affects individuals across various diagnoses, including neurodiversity, mood disorders, and personality disorders. One of the most reliable tools for assessing emotion regulation is the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). This article aims to provide an in-depth look at the DERS, its psychometric properties, and its practical applications.
The Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a 36-item self-report instrument designed to measure challenges in emotion regulation. It focuses on six key areas:
The DERS is particularly useful for identifying emotion regulation strategies in clients with various mental health conditions, including neurodiversity diagnoses, mood disorders, personality disorders, and substance use disorders.
Research has consistently shown that the DERS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing emotion regulation. It has demonstrated strong construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency. These psychometric properties make the DERS a robust tool for use across different demographic groups and mental health presentations.
The DERS uses a scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), with higher scores indicating greater difficulty in emotion regulation. The scores are presented as a total score and also broken down into the six subscales. Interestingly, higher scores can also indicate better outcomes for treatment, as emotion regulation can be taught and processed in a therapeutic setting.
While the DERS is a robust tool, it's worth noting that some studies have questioned the validity of the "Lack of Emotional Awareness" subscale. However, the overall psychometric properties of the DERS remain strong, making it a reliable tool for assessing emotion regulation challenges.
Implementing the DERS in practice can provide critical insights into a client’s emotional tolerance and regulation capabilities. This information can inform treatment plans and interventions tailored to the emotional capacity of the client. It can also be beneficial for further screenings related to neurodiversity, trauma, and alexithymia.
The DERS is a powerful tool for assessing emotion regulation, offering both clinicians and clients valuable insights into emotional challenges and strategies for improvement. Its strong psychometric properties make it a reliable choice for diverse populations and various mental health conditions.
Bardeen, J. R., Fergus, T. A., Hannan, S. M., & Orcutt, H. K. (2016). Addressing psychometric limitations of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale through item modification. Journal of personality assessment, 98(3), 298–309. Link
Fowler, J. C., Charak, R., Elhai, J. D., Allen, J. G., Frueh, B. C., & Oldham, J. M. (2014). Construct validity and factor structure of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale among adults with severe mental illness. Journal of psychiatric research, 58, 175–180. Link
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 26(1), 41-54.
Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., Tolin, D. F., & Diefenbach, G. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and its short forms in adults with emotional disorders. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 539. Link
Ritschel, L., Tone, E., Schoemann, A. M., & Lim, N. E. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Across Demographic Groups. Psychological assessment, 27, Link
Ruganci, R. N., & Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of clinical psychology, 66(4), 442–455. Link
Zhao, Y., Wu, K., Wang, Y., Zhao, G., & Zhang, E. (2022). Construct validity of brief difficulties in emotion regulation scale and its revised version: evidence for a general factor. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 41(2), 1085–1096. Link